All Categories - THE ORIGIN OF RELIGION

DO UNTO OTHERS

2/7/2021

The Golden Rule is a very ancient “moral” statement. The earliest recorded mention of it, reflecting the ancient goddess Ma’at (pronounced ‘may-et’), around 2000 B.C., is most likely not the oldest version. It possibly is a “moral’ tradition dating back to a time before writing was invented.

The concept appears in all major world traditions: Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism, Taoism, Judaism, Christianity, Zoroastrianism and still others. A form of the Golden Rule is fond in almost every culture.

The idea to treat others as you would like to be treated is, when examined closely, a very selfish concept which probably found its origin in the distant past when it was realized that, if one wanted to live peacefully in the tribe, it would be a very useful concept. All tribal rules, including localized concepts of morality, could stem from that concept, which is all compassing and does not rely on any “god” to be enforced but rather through the local tribe’s concept of morality.

The variations in the different traditions are obviously similar. Some traditions include:
“What you hate to be done to you do not do to another” (Egyptian)
“Do not do to others what you know has hurt yourself” (Tamil)
“One should never do something to others that one would regard as an injury to oneself (Sanskrit)
“Avoid doing what you would blame others for doing” (Ancient Greece)
“Treat your inferior as you wish your superior would treat you” (Ancient Rome)
“What you do not wish for yourself do not to others” (Confucianism)

This one “moral” seems to be the base upon which all other tribal rules were built. It was necessary to enforce the concept. This rule applied to everyone, theist or atheist. It has arisen during human evolution as a concept that has been very beneficial to the only hominid genotype which skirted extinction. The rule seems to still be applied in modern human societies. Humanism has also adopted the “Do Unto Others” concept as applicable to all humankind. For versions of the Golden Rule, not a single one of these versions requires a god or any similar supernatural entity.

ABIOGENESIS

12/27/2020

With the start of the New Year, it is a great time to contemplate another important start, that of abiogenesis: the start of life from non-life.
The position of many theists, even those who realize evolution is a fact confirmed by evidence, is that it cannot be just a chance occurrence because the odds are so fantastically great that the universe in not old enough for that to have happened, when accounting for the laws of nature as we know them. The transition from non-living to living organisms, in earth’s history, is assumed to not be a singular event. Abiogenesis is not controversial among scientists.Theists state that the only possible way that life could have been created must be the work of a supernatural being.

Researchers from the University of Duisburg-Essen, in Germany, have recreated the inhospitable, severe environment and the geochemical conditions, deep in the earth’s crust, approximately 3.8 billion years ago. They created bubble-like structures of the pre-biological conditions which survived the harsh environment. Such vesicles might have become stable enough to come to the surface during geyser eruptions, geologist Ulrich Schreibers stated.

The research paper is still under peer review and we will be looking for further development. Scientists are coming closer and closer to proof that abiogenesis is possible and that the results are reproducible. Pressure, geochemical conditions and nature’s laws created the precursors of life in the early earth. It is likely that there are many locations on many planets where the same environment exists. Therefore, in my humble opinion, the transition of non-life to life is not an impossible occurrence by chance, at improbable odds, as many people think, but that it is an inevitable result of the geochemical environment and the laws of nature in many places in the universe. I further contend that we will eventually find life elsewhere, even in our own solar system, and that on far away planets life has evolved. To what extent we will probably never know because of the size of the universe.

Intelligent Design?

10/27/2020

Intelligent Design

When discussing the existence of God, the theists often express the opinion that the existence of God is obvious. Just look around you, they say, look at the magnificent structure of the universe, the beauty of nature, and the fine tuning of the natural forces, fine tuned to make life possible. In fact, a small deviation from the values of the fundamental forces would make life impossible, therefore, there must be an intelligent designer. They express astonishment that non-theists do not see that a supernatural power must exist.

To the unbelievers, their observations of reality come to the opposite conclusion. They often express astonishment, when the facts are observed, that someone would think that God is perfect instead of incompetent, especially when we look closely at the life-forms around us.

Looking at nature, we find many flaws in plants and animals currently occupying the planet. We also know, through archaeology and paleontology, that over 90% of the species which have ever lived are extinct. Those species, in many cases, could not adapt to changes in the earth’s climate.

Humans are at the top of the food chain. Viruses and bacteria attack all life forms and many species still show vestiges from previous forms, such as in the human tailbone, indicating that only by changing and adaptation do species survive. We are still evolving. Evolution never stops and most random changes are not viable unless, by chance, they fit the changing environment.

Disasters and diseases are part of life. The universe is 99.9% hostile to life. Life on earth could be wiped out by chance if an errant large meteorite hit this small little vulnerable rock circling around the sun which will itself eventually destroy this tiny planet.

Theists often point to the complexity of the human eye. They assert that the human eye could not have evolved without an intelligent designer. However, when we look at all of the various forms and structures of eyes across a myriad of species, we find all sorts of structures from very simple light detecting patches to complicated insect eyes which evolved in totally different ways, exposing how the random processes of evolution work. Only useful adaptions, out of many, will survive for a while.

Another argument Theists like to mention is that the random electrical and chemical events needed to form the first self-replicating molecule are highly improbable and would need to overcome such enormous odds that the universe is not old enough for such events to happen. This indicates the misunderstanding of odds. We can observe that lotteries, with millions of odds, have winners every few weeks. You could win tomorrow! It doesn’t take millions of draws to produce a winner and certainly a universe with “zillions” of “draws” every femto-second could have more than one winner, although we are sure of only one winner, since we are here. Help from a divine entity is not required.

For all the above reasons and through observing nature, life is actually full of design imperfections which indicate random development rather than intelligent design. We won the lottery so make the best of it.

Evolution Revisited

10/3/2020

Atheists and other non-believers in supernatural phenomena are not the only ones who have accepted the reality of evolution. Many Christians and other theists have realized that the observable facts and findings constantly reaffirm, refine and correct the scientific conclusions and the picture has become clearer and clearer. Many Christians understand that the Bible is to be taken metaphorically, not literally, and they realize that the “days” in Genesis metaphorically and symbolically indicate a “period of time.” They also understand that each metaphorical “day” covers a period of time that is far longer than 24 hours. Evolution is accepted by 98% of scientists and by many theists.
The human writers of the biblical texts had no conception of the geologic history of the earth or the enormous length of time required for our planet to form. The best that they could do was to apply a period of time that they could observe (a "day") to their ancient theology. They lacked any conception of science and, thus, evolution.
The debate is long over, except for a small group of “young creationists” who have developed an alternate “science” to “prove” that the earth is less than 10,000 years old, a pseudo science which has been thoroughly debunked. According to this pseudo science, no star in the observable universe could then be farther away than 10,000 light years. Real science tells us that is not the case.
I suggest that we ignore these “young earth creationist” arguments by reminding creationists that their “science” has been proven to be in conflict with real, observable facts. We attempt to limit debate between theists who claim that evolution is God’s way to create life and non-believers’ assertion that the laws of nature provide the best, and most accurate, explanation of the origin of life.
I wrote this post to assert that any debate about the veracity of evolution is over. Because evolutionary biology is an established fact and that it forms the basis for modern science and modern living, the only remaining debate is whether evolution is God’s way or nature’s way to reproduce life.

Y0u Are Alone

8/10/2020

I am relaxing on my favorite lawn-chair enjoying the breezy, sunny, summer weather in the cool shade of an oak tree and quaffing a cool beer. A little squirrel is carefully approaching, ready to flee if I make a move. I absorb the environment through my five senses which connect me to reality. It suddenly occurs to me that I am the only person in the whole universe who observes these immediate surroundings. Just me! Isn’t that miraculous?
My senses are recording the sounds, the smells, the landscape, the temperature, and the taste of the beer and my brain organizes all this information to create not only a picture in my mind but also to create a feeling of peace and contentment, just for me alone.
I will never know how another person, when experiencing a similar set of conditions, would perceive this scene. The grass reflects a certain frequency of light that we all call green, but I will never know how another brain interprets that same frequency. Perhaps my “green” is “red” for someone else? What about smell and taste? Are they the same for everybody? Obviously, they are not, because we have different likes and dislikes. But there is no way to know. Emotionally, we also differ in our reactions to similar situations.
Yes, we are unique and alone. We cannot read the thoughts of others. We can guess their thoughts by observing body language but we cannot ever be certain to know what another person thinks. I know that some magicians pretend that they can read minds and some people believe in extrasensory perception (ESP) but, over a hundred years of serious research in ESP and meta-physics, the results have been fruitless. Even money rewards, such as James Randi’s one million dollars if scientific evidence could be shown to verify ESP, have never been claimed.
Yes, you are alone. Observe through your senses what it is like to be alive. That experience is different from person to person and you will never know how other brains construct the environment that we call the reality in which we live. Although we are alone, that does not mean that we are necessarily lonely. Enjoy your life as much as you can; it is the only one you will ever get.

Mass Delusions

6/1/2020

MASS DELUSIONS
I know I am going to get dumped upon but I will take the chance that enough people will at least think about it. I want to make a distinction between clinical and common delusions. In this post, will not be talking about "clinical delusion" which is associated with mental disease. I am writing about a different and even more devastating delusion which is "mass delusion."
I have written about delusional people before and I have written that religion is, itself, a delusion. The comments that I have received have rejected the assertion that religion is a delusion and point to the absurdity of such an assertion by noting that the majority of the world's population would be mentally ill (or, at least, deluded) if religion was found to be a delusion. I am not saying that most people in the world are clinical delusional, but I am saying that we have inherited a tendency to accept delusions because we have a capacity to imagine anything as illustrated by the imaginative creations of Superman and Harry Potter. When these imaginations are believed to be real, they become delusions.
The strength of delusion-beliefs (DB)vary from person to person, from skeptics to ultra-believers, distributed on a bell-curve which is similar to the intelligence bell-curve but not correlated to it. A person with a very high intelligence quotient (IQ) can be anywhere on the DB curve. Here we have the juxtaposition of delusion and intelligence. What I always wondered at is how very intelligent persons, high on the IQ curve, leaders in biology, for example, defend creation stories over evolution. Does it depend on their inherited positions on the delusion-belief bell-curve?
So we are all subject to delusional-beliefs and everyone fits somewhere on the bell-curve. Many conspiracies theories, as examples of delusions, have a great deal of support in the population. Most conspiracy theories have little effect but some can cost lives. You only have to look at the millions who think that President D. Trump, no matter what he does, is doing a great job. Trump has called COVID-19 a plot by Democrats to........... well, here it is not clear at all what the strategy or intentions of Democrats might be. What might be the actual end-game for the Democrats to introduce a global pandemic? Can Democrats also be blamed for the emergence of COVID-19 in China? If so, then is this what is intended by the Texas County GOP Chair who recently incited a gathering to take off masks and hug each other. If Democrats have a plot to kill millions with a virus, then are the Republicans complicit in the plot by instructing adherents to remove their masks, thus promoting the spread of the Democrat's deadly plague? It is difficult to see which of them, Democrats or Republicans, are to blame for COVID-19. Or was it a joint effort: Democrats introduced COVID-19 after consultations with a secret laboratory in China and have co-opted Republicans to help them spread COVID-19 by getting ordinary citizens to remove their face masks at Republican Trump-promoting rallies? Asserting a political rationale to the spread of COVID-19 is a double-edged sword. Is it possible to see any positive, well-intended and well-considered plot by one party or another to kill thousands of Americans or, alternatively, is it possible to suggest that both Republican and Democrats wish to promote COVID-19 to kill fellow citizens? If so, why? Or is this yet another example of the illogical delusion-beliefs carelessly promoted by individuals who have abandoned all vestiges of critical thinking?
So it is obvious that many millions of people are susceptible to delusions and since delusions are very persistent and hard to overcome, we will have to be resolute to fight this inherited tribal instinct, as we fight other ones which are obsolete in the modern world, such as rape and tribal genocide, because we are the only tribe left in the world.
We survived the Neanderthals and Denisovans. Now we will have to adapt to survive.

Does cosmic consciousness exist

5/21/2020

Neuroscientists, physicists and philosophers, all engaged in the study of consciousness, have proposed several theories trying to explain the phenomenon of consciousness. Some are claiming that consciousness needs only a material brain but others claim that non-local consciousness is responsible for the sensations that we experience.

There is an inborn human wish that death cannot be the end of our short period of awareness and therefore humans keep searching for reasons to prove one can live forever, but it is time to realize the fact that we are here for a short time only and therefore we should enjoy the enormous luck that gives us a chance to experience this window in our magnificent universe.

I like to make the point that intelligent educated but religious persons trying to use the latest in physics by esoteric philosophy to hang on to the idea of an afterlife when it doesn't seem make sense if we use critical thinking. The trouble I have is to express their philosophy to the readers in a short essay, where many even may know little about quantum physics and therefor are impressed with the famous names which the theists throw around to make their argument sound genuine. So here i argue that even if their theories become proven true, the afterlife, as it is envisioned by most people as an extension of earth life, is still not valid.

Dr. Stuart Hameroff, anesthesiologist and professor at the University of Arizona, holds the controversial opinion that "consciousness originates from quantum states in neural microtubules" and claims to have confirmed that the material brain cannot create consciousness and that consciousness exists independently of the brain. There are several theories of consciousness that involve quantum physics. Dr. Hameroff and the well-known British physicist Sir Roger Penrose claim that consciousness resides in microtubules of braincells which are primarily sites of quantum processing. Dr Hameroff stated;"Upon death this info is released from the body, meaning that your consciousness goes with it."

They have argued that our experience of consciousness is the result of quantum gravity effects in those microtubules, a theory dubbed Orchestrated Objective Reduction (Orch-OR) postulates that consciousness originates at the quantum level inside neurons rather than the conventional view that it is a product of connections between neurons. The mechanism is held to be a quantum process that is orchestrated by cellular structures called microtubules

Dr. Hameroff told science channel, through the wormhole documentary, "let's say that the heart stops beating, blood stops flowing, the microtubules lose their quantum state. The quantum information within the microtubules is not destroyed. It can't be destroyed. It just distributes and dissipates to the universe at large. Renowned scientist Lanza adds that "not only does it exist in the universe, it exists perhaps (perhaps?) in another universe." So, is there really a part of your consciousness that is non-material and will live on after the death of the physical body? Hameroff stated "There is supposedly (supposedly?) a cosmic awareness which makes human consciousness possible, therefore, once your physical body dies it will find another one and remains part of the cosmic consciousness. Energy cannot be destroyed, so the awareness continues".

Dr. Hameroff's tortured theory is an attempt to prove that quantum theory can be used to denote an afterlife. Let's assume that Dr. Hameroff is correct and that consciousness cannot be formed in the material brain but needs a "cosmic consciousness" in order to form. The focus, then, should not be on the operational details of microtubules, which are well understood, but on the existence of a "cosmic consciousness." Where is this theorized cosmic consciousness and how might we prove its existence?

There also seems to be confusion between consciousness and awareness. The recognition of "self" relies on your memory stored in your material brain. There is now enough research to establish that as a fact. Many cases of brain injuries and diseases have shown that they can destroy parts or all of your memory (total amnesia for example). Observing Alzheimer's patients also shows that awareness of "self," depending on your memories, slowly dies when the brain functions slowly deteriorate, it is therefore immaterial whether your consciousness needs a cosmic connection to exist if awareness dies with the material brain. Since everyone's awareness of "self" dies with the memories, it is irrelevant whether the energy in your microtubules returns to the "cosmic consciousness." Dr. Hameroff claims that, because energy cannot be destroyed, the consciousness generated in quantum processes in microtubules is "distributed and dissipated to the universe at large." But even if this is true, the memory which constitutes your "self" will die with the material brain.

What Causes Consciousness

4/18/2020

Consciousness has baffled mankind for a long time. There are many philosophies and speculations that try to explain it but none have yet been verified with empirical evidence. What is becoming evident, however, is that consciousness is a function of the brain. In other words, it is created by the matter which constitutes our brain and is not, as many have speculated, a function of supposedly supernatural forces external to the natural brain.

There are many psychedelic drugs such as lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) and dimethyltryptamine (DMT) which influence one’s thoughts and beliefs. Experiments with these drugs have shown that they can change one’s beliefs and ideas permanently.

Last April, the Imperial College in London launched the Centre for Psychedelic Research to study the effect of mind-altering substances. It published a report in the journal Scientific Reports. The Centre outfitted 13 volunteers with brain activity caps and injected DMT into them. There was a notable increase in theta waves which occur when one dreams. Researcher Christopher Timmerman stated: “It’s like day-dreaming, only far more vivid and immersive, it is like dreaming with your eyes open.” Robert Carhart-Harris, head of the Centre, said “the knowledge that the drug appears to produce something akin to waking sleep could help unravel the mystery of consciousness.”

Thus, the conjecture is that consciousness is getting closer to being elucidated in the foreseeable future and that the notion of consciousness is a brain function, needing a living material brain, is becoming clearer. Awareness and your identity depend on your consciousness and your memories, which are all functions of your brain. When the brain dies, the awareness dies, as we observe in Alzheimer patients. Without awareness, the afterlife is a moot point.

World Chaos

2/29/2020

A friend asked me why the world cannot get it together and is always in turmoil and conflict. My guess is that the tribal instinct of defending the tribe against other tribes is buried in our genes. It is apparent that the tendency toward cooperation between individuals within ancient tribes was highly effective but it did not extend to other tribes which were viewed as competitors and, therefore, the enemies. It might take a long time before the world human population regards itself as being one tribe.

Looking at other animals, such as wolves, monkeys and wild dogs, we notice that they often form packs that cooperate in obtaining food and they protect the weaker members of the pack. There seems to be a limit to the size of the pack, perhaps because packs that are too large are too difficult to organize into an efficient unit. If that is the case with humans as well, the future looks bleak unless we conquer our hereditary instincts.

Inherited instincts are hard to overcome but most of us have been able to prevail over some of those instincts, which don’t suit our modern way of life, to a great extent, such as rape and killing, by our ability to reason rather than to rely on instincts. We, humans, might be successful eventually by realizing we are one tribe instead of fractionalizing into smaller groups.

It is an interesting topic and the above is a quick reaction to the question and I realize to have to do a lot more research and reading about this subject before a reasonable theory can be drawn. Sometimes I am overwhelmed, not only because of the amount of information, but also for verification of reliable sources of such data. The truth is very hard to find.

Does Atheism Mock Theism?

1/1/2020

Many times I have read posts that question why so many atheists and agnostics are “attacking” theists who say “Leave us alone and let us live the way we believe in. We should live side by side in peace and respect our differences.”

Here is an example of such a post:
I want to say something about the spirituality debate. You don't believe in God? That's ok, but why is it so important for many of you to mock those of us that do? If we're wrong, what have we lost when we die? Nothing! How does our faith in Jesus Christ bring you any harm? You think it makes me stupid? Gullible? Ignorant? That's ok, too. How does that affect you? If you're wrong, your consequence is far worse. I would rather live my life believing in God and serving Him and find out I was right than not believe in Him, and not serve Him, and find out I was wrong. Then it's too late.
Ain't no shame in my game! I believe in Jesus Christ. He said deny me in front of your friends and I will deny you in front of my Father.
Facebook Challenge:
If you're not ashamed copy & paste it! God is Good!
I'm willing to do this...how about you?
God is good, Amen!
No, you are not stupid, gullible or ignorant, and I do not mock but rather respect your beliefs. However, there is a reason why I “challenge” religion. By showing why religion is a man-made concept, I hope that the damage done by religion can be mitigated.
All religions always want to enforce their "morals" on the "other" religions and non-religious people. Some recent examples of theists “forcing” religion down the throats of non-believers include anti-abortion activities and proposals to adopt sharia law. Strife between denominations also can lead to great trouble. Religious fanatics who kill others include suicide bombers, LGBTQ haters and parents who let their children die because they believe in prayer more than modern medicine or withhold blood transfusions. These religious fanatics are, well, religious. Atheists and agnostics don’t kill others with suicide attacks. Atheists and agnostics don’t “force” atheism down the throats of believers. Atheists and agnostics are not dangers to society. It is the religious fanatics who pose the biggest threat to the security of others.
Big churches get the use of infrastructure, police and fire protection without paying taxes. These churches use the money raised to help people in poor countries to build churches and promote their religion. That's how it affects the rest of us. The churches “force” religion down the throats of the most vulnerable. It is a quid pro quo: the churches offer religion in exchange for food and other resources.
Therefore, it is imperative that atheists and agnostics fight religion. We respect religions that are peaceful and tolerant, pay their taxes and do not try to foist their outdated “morals” and “laws” on the rest of us. You can copy and paste this as well.
As a footnote: Look up Pascal's Wager, if you are a theist, in Wikipedia; you’ll discover why it is invalid.