Believers often use the argument that the complexity of the universe cannot have formed randomly and therefor is “proof that a designer must have created it. I found the following argument In the Disqus forum
To go from the singularity instantly to the laws of physics, the Higgs Boson particle, up and down quarks, the fine tuning of the universe, the beauty, logic and perfection of mathematics, the DNA programming code that governs all life, intelligence, consciousness, beauty all provide evidence for a non-material intelligent creator.
“provide evidence for a non-material intelligent creator?” No it doesn't. It an assertion you make. Just since one "believes" that it does, doesn't make it FACTUAL. Again using science terms to impress people, who on the whole, are not familiar with or do not understand Quantum Physics, does not prove anything, complexity can be created by random happenings. To use DNA as an example shows that it is so "complex that it must have been created" is demonstratedly false. It proves just the opposite. The DNA code has many flaws and obsolete sections which we can observe, indicating trial and error in evolution, successful mutations survived, although still not perfect, and unsuccessful ones died off, an observable fact, showing random trial and error not intelligence design.
To go from the singularity instantly to the laws of physics, the Higgs Boson particle, up and down quarks, the fine tuning of the universe, the beauty, logic and perfection of mathematics, the DNA programming code that governs all life, intelligence, consciousness, beauty all provide evidence for a non-material intelligent creator.
“provide evidence for a non-material intelligent creator?” No it doesn't. It an assertion you make. Just since one "believes" that it does, doesn't make it FACTUAL. Again using science terms to impress people, who on the whole, are not familiar with or do not understand Quantum Physics, does not prove anything, complexity can be created by random happenings. To use DNA as an example shows that it is so "complex that it must have been created" is demonstratedly false. It proves just the opposite. The DNA code has many flaws and obsolete sections which we can observe, indicating trial and error in evolution, successful mutations survived, although still not perfect, and unsuccessful ones died off, an observable fact, showing random trial and error not intelligence design.
RSS Feed