THE ORIGIN OF RELIGION
  • HOME
  • BEN'S BLOG
  • About The Book
    • BookStore
  • Reviews
  • About The Origin of Religion
  • The origin of spirit
  • FINAL CONCLUSION
  • Contact
  • Blog

BEN'S  BLOG
Click on "Archives" for all blogs since November  2013

Is the bible to be taken literally?

2/23/2014

1 Comment

 
During a discussions on a forum debating creationism and evolutionism  the believers often quoted the bible insisting that this ancient manuscript, although written and translated by humans, were inspired by god and therefor it was god’s word and must be taken literally, then used the literal text to “proof” creationism was real.  My point was that the bible, after many translations and retold myths was interesting but could not be taken literally. I used the example of the commandment “Thou shalt not kill”. If we take that literally then all killing is  immoral. A debater with the pen-name ‘keepyoureyespeeled” challenced that opinion. Here is the exchange:

Keepyoureyespeeled:"Now lets us look at one of the ten commandments “thou shalt not kill’"
-More correctly "murder".


Ben Andrews: WHY the "correction" because you want to say that not all killing is murder? Wars, for example? or people burned at the stake who didn't "believe"? Also if "killing" doesn't fit your view and have no answer to my statement that makes sense, you change it to "murder" because that was actually meant (God told you so) After all the original translation said so (since you are an ancient language specialist who can translate the original text). If non-believers use such arguments then they are dismissed with: “You can't do that, you have to take the bible literally, not only the original writers but subsequent translators are all God-inspired”. If this was not a correct explanation for "correcting" killing to murder, then the comment was totally irrelevant to the discussion
so why is it there? So just use "Thou shalt not Kill" literary, no exception mentioned in your always literally true bible

WHY the "correction" because you want to say that not all killing is murder?"
It is correct that not all killing is murder, regardless of what I want. Killing is a neutral act without
moral or lawful implications...murder goes against morality or law. That commandment is more correctly translated as "murder" rather than "kill". This is all simple dictionary definitions...and quick research
into the Bible."Wars, for example?"-Depends on the rules for war...right? Are you saying that law does not allow for killing in war time? If killing is deemed lawful, it is not murder. If killing is unlawful, it can become murder.Though, without objective moral values, why is killing in war wrong?"or people burned at the stake who didn't "believe"?-I think this is wrong (and I am justified in my belief)...and that was deemed right by people at that time...reminiscent of the Nazis, eh? Though in your view, without objective moral values, why is any of this wrong?


If "killing" doesn't fit your view and have no answer to my statement that makes sense, you change it to "murder" because that was actually meant (God told you so)"



-Not sure what you are getting at here. The translation is "you shall not murder"...the Hebrew word being used for murder is "ratsach "."After all the original translation said so ( since you are an ancient language specialist who can translate the original text)."
-I make no such claim that I am a specialist in anything whatsoever. The facts do not rely on me being a specialist. I can easily cite them from reliable sources. Here's an excerpt from the Theological Wordbook of the OT.>ratsach pronounce:rä·tsakh
root (rasah) murder, slay, kill. Rasah is a purely Hebrew term. It has no clear cognate in any of the contemporary tongues. The root occurs thirty-eight times in the OT, with fourteen occurrences in Num 35. The initial use of the root appears in the Ten Commandments (Ex 20:13). In that important text it appears in the simple Qal stem with the negative adverb, "You shall not murder," being a more precise reading than the too-general KJV "thou shalt not kill." <


"So just use "Thou shalt not Kill" literary, no exception mentioned in your always literally true bible."

-That would be less-accurate. Why are you supporting the view of being less accurate in your studies? Don't you follow science? In science,shouldn't you try to be as accurate and learn as accurately as possible, while presenting the facts as accurately as possible?
You must also study contexts and word meanings..however, it certainly says "murder" in typical everyday used Bibles such as:
http://www.biblegateway.com/pa...and http://www.biblegateway.com/pa...and http://www.biblegateway.com/pa...
etc...

Yes as you probably noticed in my statement, I foresaw your answer. Let me point out to you, that you agree the King James bible was not translated accurately. Thank you. Proved my point. If the bible was not  always translated accurately as in the Kings James version then how many times did this happen? If God wrote the bible through his inspired humans why are there inaccurate translations that must be corrected if they don' fit well and must be re-interpreted to fit. Sorry to be so picky, but how can I take the bible literally if that, as you admit, is the case. Deafening silence since then.

1 Comment
James Heron
1/24/2015 12:53:24 pm

The Old Testament is the result of the history of the Jews. Genesis is based orally on their understanding of the universe at that time which was 'zilch' and the rest of the Old Testament was based on their rules for living with each other and justification for their invading other people's lands. Being a 'chosen people' by a god lent an air of legitimacy to their actions.

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Ben Vande       
    Weerdhof
    Andrews


    Retired Teacher
    Author
    Videographer






    Archives of
    previous Blogs

    December 2024
    November 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    May 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    June 2023
    April 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    November 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    March 2022
    January 2022
    October 2021
    August 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    February 2021
    December 2020
    October 2020
    August 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

    Click RSS feed for previous blogs

Ben's Blog

About Origin OF Religion

About THe Book

BooKStore

Contact

  • HOME
  • BEN'S BLOG
  • About The Book
    • BookStore
  • Reviews
  • About The Origin of Religion
  • The origin of spirit
  • FINAL CONCLUSION
  • Contact
  • Blog