THE ORIGIN OF RELIGION
  • HOME
  • BEN'S BLOG
  • About The Book
    • BookStore
  • Reviews
  • About The Origin of Religion
  • The origin of spirit
  • FINAL CONCLUSION
  • Contact
  • Blog

BEN'S  BLOG
Click on "Archives" for all blogs since November  2013

Pseudo Science

9/22/2014

1 Comment

 
One commentator posed the question:
Do you think it is possible that science books, theories, etc. could be influenced by the egos and frail human nature of those producing them?
any intelligent person, at a minimum, has to have a theory to explain: 1. how did life begin? 2. how does time have no beginning 3. how does space go on forever.
I can tell you any scientific explanation proposed, dwarfs Christianity's, in being laughable and ridiculous.


Where should I begin. First you misuse the word" theory" as it is used in science. Scientists observe, then make a hypothesis (educated guess) as a starting point of further investigations. (Many of you here, misuse the word "theory" as meaning "hypothesis”.) Then facts either confirm or disprove the hypothesis. If enough facts and observation, confirmed by many contemporary peers, and this happens step after step, then it becomes a theory, this might not be the final step and the theory can then be further developed, step after step. and critically tested by many others. None of this is the case with any ancient written hypothesis. Repeating stories from witnesses and other hearsay does not constitute a theory.

There are indeed many pseudo science books written by writers with unconfirmed “hypothesis” but they lack the critical reviews and repeat experiments and are indeed influenced by “the egos and frail human nature of those producing them”. Erich Von Daniken’s Chariots of the gods, (1984) comes to mind here. There are some scientists, who publish before their contemporaries have tested and confirmed that their hypothesis can be developed into a theory, warranting further investigations. Such scientist will quickly lose their reputation and are shunned by the rest of the scientific community.  One such hypothesis,  that the earth, created in the same week as the universe, is younger than 10,000 years old. We can now measure the speed of light. We can measure how far stars are away with he parallax method. We can then calculate how long it takes for the star light to reach us, all very common methods, then we find that many stars are much farther away than 10, 000 light-years (the time it took for the light of the star to reach us since it came into existence). These measurements are taken by many observers at different times and confirmed so we can honestly say, that that hypothesis is incorrect and does not even qualify as a theory. End of story.

Secondly you state “any intelligent person, at a minimum, has to have a theory to explain: 1. how did life begin? 2. how does time have no beginning 3. how does space go on forever.” Is not true. You don’t “have to”. It is more honest to say “I don’t know yet (but because if I look at the development of science we will eventually find out) than to put up a speculation grounded in unproven and untested hypothesis written down in ancient times. Any one can dream up a hypothesis, no matter how unlikely, and then demand “proof that it is incorrect”. If that was logical I can hypothesize that Zeus (Thor and 4000 other deities) exist and ask you for proof that they don’t. You DON”T have to have a THEORY (misuse of the word again, use “speculation” or “hypothesis”). If you do you must have FACTS to back up the hypothesis. (another problem is that people who don’t agree simply ignore facts, and are in denial). The Theory of Gravity is another example. We don’t know the full answer yet but it is not a hypothesis. We can observe it (jump of a building, we can calculate rocket trajectories). It’s a theory although not fully developed yet.

Thirdly you wrote: “I can tell you any scientific explanation proposed, dwarfs Christianity's, in being laughable and ridiculous“ That was what Galileo was told by the Church about his scientific explanation, of the earth rotating about the sun!





1 Comment
Thom Speechley link
9/22/2014 12:31:09 pm

This issue is relevant to any "science". Witness the recent confessions
of the scientist who started the vaccine/autism panic. Doubters still
cling to that fiction. The strength of science is that it has accepted
checks and balances. IE: Proof!
All 'faith' based beliefs never even ask the questions.

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Ben Vande       
    Weerdhof
    Andrews


    Retired Teacher
    Author
    Videographer






    Archives of
    previous Blogs

    December 2024
    November 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    May 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    June 2023
    April 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    November 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    March 2022
    January 2022
    October 2021
    August 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    February 2021
    December 2020
    October 2020
    August 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

    Click RSS feed for previous blogs

Ben's Blog

About Origin OF Religion

About THe Book

BooKStore

Contact

  • HOME
  • BEN'S BLOG
  • About The Book
    • BookStore
  • Reviews
  • About The Origin of Religion
  • The origin of spirit
  • FINAL CONCLUSION
  • Contact
  • Blog